For most licence applications, the money laundering reporting officer (MLRO) and the head of compliance are the two appointments the FCA examines most closely after the chief executive. They are the people who will keep the firm inside the rules once it is authorised, and the case officer tests whether they can. A strong candidate with direct experience of the firm's products shortens the assessment; a candidate whose experience does not match the business leads to interviews, further questions and sometimes a request to appoint someone else.
The MLRO is the person who receives internal reports of suspected money laundering, decides whether to report to the National Crime Agency (NCA), and oversees the firm's anti-money laundering systems. The head of compliance, often called the compliance officer, owns the compliance monitoring plan and advises the board on its regulatory obligations. In smaller firms one experienced person can hold both roles.
Three sets of rules apply, depending on the firm.
Regulation 21 requires every firm in scope, where appropriate to its size and nature, to appoint a member of the board or senior management as the officer responsible for compliance with the regulations, to screen relevant employees before and during employment, and to set up an independent audit function for its controls. Every firm must appoint an individual in the firm as nominated officer, the legal term for the MLRO, and tell the FCA within 14 days of each appointment.
SYSC 6.3.8R requires an FSMA firm to give a director or senior manager overall responsibility for its anti-money laundering systems and controls, and SYSC 6.3.9R requires it to appoint an MLRO with the authority, independence and access to resources the role needs. The guidance in SYSC 6.3 adds that the MLRO acts as the focal point for all anti-money laundering activity, is expected to be based in the UK, and reports to senior management at least once a year on how well the controls are working.
In FSMA firms the MLRO role is senior management function SMF17 and compliance oversight is SMF16. Both are approved by the FCA before the person starts. The firm's SM&CR guide explains the functions, statements of responsibilities and the 2026 changes under PS26/6.
The MLRO and compliance roles exist in every regulated firm, but the approval route differs.
| Firm | MLRO | Compliance lead |
|---|---|---|
| Authorised payment institution | Nominated officer under the Money Laundering Regulations; assessed in the application; FCA told within 14 days of later changes | Not an SMF; assessed as one of the people responsible for managing payment services |
| Small payment institution | Nominated officer; often combined with compliance in a small team | Assessed at registration |
| Authorised or small e-money institution | Nominated officer; assessed in the application | Not an SMF; assessed as part of the management |
| Registered cryptoasset firm | Nominated officer; officers and managers pass the fit and proper test in regulation 58A | Assessed at registration |
| FSMA firm (core or enhanced) | SMF17, approved by the FCA before starting | SMF16, approved by the FCA before starting |
| FSMA firm (limited scope) | SMF17 where the firm is under the Money Laundering Regulations | SMF16 where the permissions require it; otherwise covered by SMF29 |
Payment and e-money institutions are outside SM&CR, so the MLRO is not a senior management function there. The FCA still assesses the MLRO's competence and integrity in the application, and the firm notifies the FCA of any change. Cryptoasset firms authorised under the new FSMA regime, which commences on 25 October 2027, will be FSMA firms, so applicants should plan for their MLRO and compliance roles to be assessed as senior management functions.
Since CASS 15 came into force on 7 May 2026, payment and e-money institutions must give a single director or senior manager of sufficient skill and authority responsibility for overseeing operational compliance with the safeguarding rules and reporting on it to the board (CASS 15.2.4R). In small firms this is often the compliance officer or the finance director. It belongs in the same hiring plan, because the case officer reviews it alongside the MLRO.
The FCA applies its fit and proper test: honesty, integrity and reputation; competence and capability; and financial soundness. For these two roles, competence carries the most weight, and it is judged against the firm's own business.
The strongest candidates have done the same job, or worked closely under someone who did, in a firm with similar products, customers and payment flows. A remittance business looks for experience of corridor risk and agent oversight; a card issuer for transaction monitoring at volume; a crypto firm for blockchain analytics and the travel rule. Backgrounds in compliance, financial crime, legal, audit and regulatory consulting all count. Experience mainly in sales or front-line roles usually needs supplementing.
The FCA looks for training that is current, relevant to the firm's sector and deeper than an introductory course. A recognised professional qualification in anti-money laundering or compliance with an assessed examination carries more weight than attendance certificates.
The role needs enough time to be done properly. Full-time appointments are normal for authorised payment and e-money institutions and for most FSMA firms with retail customers. A part-time MLRO can suit a small firm if the hours are proportionate to the volume and risk of the business and are set out in the application; in the firm's experience, a commitment of a few hours a week is rarely accepted for an authorised firm. The FCA expects the MLRO to be based in the UK, ideally at the firm's main place of business.
The MLRO and compliance officer need the standing to challenge the chief executive and the board, and direct access to the board. They should be independent of sales and other client-facing work, and any other duties should not create a conflict with the oversight role.
Many firms use an outsourced compliance provider or consultant for monitoring reviews, policy drafting or training. That is acceptable, but the MLRO must be an individual in the firm, and the decisions stay with the firm's own people. The FCA expects the MLRO to understand the advice, decide whether and how to act on it, and be able to explain the decision.
An application that relies wholly on an external adviser to supply the firm's compliance knowledge prompts questions about whether the firm can run itself. The stronger model is an in-house MLRO and compliance officer supported by external specialists for independent testing and peak workload, with the arrangement documented in the outsourcing policy.
The firm's article on financial crime controls in payment institutions sets out what the FCA expects those controls to contain.
The compliance officer runs the compliance monitoring plan, tests whether the firm follows its own policies, reports findings to the board and tracks them to closure. They advise on new products and marketing, oversee complaints handling and regulatory reporting, and keep the firm's policies current with rule changes, including the Consumer Duty for firms with retail customers.
| Route | FCA timeframe |
|---|---|
| SMF16 or SMF17 approval in an FSMA firm | 3 months statutory maximum; 2 month target; median of 25 days in Q1 2026/27 |
| MLRO in a new payment or e-money application | Assessed within the authorisation itself |
| Change of MLRO in a payment, e-money or registered crypto firm | Notify the FCA within 14 days of the appointment |
The FCA's own interviews of proposed MLROs and compliance officers focus on the firm in front of them, not general knowledge. Asking the same questions before appointment shows whether the candidate is ready.
Clear, specific answers grounded in the business plan are what the case officer looks for. A candidate who answers in general terms needs a stronger induction before the application is submitted.
Finding an MLRO or compliance officer with the right sector experience is often the longest step before an application can be submitted. Buckingham Capital Consulting sources key people for licence applications, including MLROs, compliance officers, safeguarding leads and UK-based directors for payment, e-money, cryptoasset and FSMA firms. Candidates are assessed against the firm's business plan and the FCA's expectations before they are put forward, so the people named in the application match what the case officer will test.
The same assessment applies to existing firms replacing an MLRO, preparing for a change of control or responding to FCA feedback on their financial crime controls. The firm's financial crime service covers the controls the new MLRO will own, and its guide to applying for FCA authorisation explains how key appointments fit into the application.
No. Payment and e-money institutions are outside SM&CR, so the MLRO is not an SMF. The firm must still appoint a nominated officer under the Money Laundering Regulations, and the FCA assesses that person in the application.
Yes, in a smaller firm, if the person has the experience and time for both roles. Larger or higher-risk firms usually separate them.
Tasks can be outsourced, but the nominated officer must be an individual in the firm. External advisers support the MLRO; they do not replace the decision-maker.
The FCA expects it. SYSC 6.3.10G states that the FCA expects the MLRO to be based in the UK.
The statutory maximum is 3 months for a complete application. The FCA targets 2 months, and its median in Q1 2026/27 was 25 days.
Yes. Under regulation 21 of the Money Laundering Regulations the firm informs the FCA within 14 days of appointing a nominated officer; FSMA firms also need SMF17 approval before the new MLRO starts.
Under CASS 15.2.4R, a single director or senior manager with sufficient skill and authority must oversee safeguarding compliance and report on it to the board.
Buckingham Capital Consulting has obtained FCA licences for payment and e-money firms including Nexpay, Orbital, Global Send, Dzing Finance and Hryze since 2013, and sources the MLROs, compliance officers and directors those applications need. The firm assesses each candidate against the business plan and the FCA's expectations, and prepares the approvals and notifications that go with the appointment.
Speak to an expert: WhatsApp +44 7563 115980, Telegram @buckinghamcapital or info@buckinghamcapitalconsulting.co.uk.
This article is general information, reviewed against the regulator’s published requirements on the date shown. It is not legal advice; the regulator’s current publications take precedence.